News 05 Dec. 2024
Partner Dr. Alexandra G. Maier Recognized Again in Lexology Client Choice Award 2025, Mining Experts Category 2025
more
Event 23 Oct. 2024
Counsel Mohannad El Murtadi Suleiman to Speak at the 2nd Annual Africa Arbitration Day in New York
Event 18 Aug. 2023
Partner Borzu Sabahi Speaks at FDI Moot Shenzhen
News 25 Jul. 2023
Partner Eric Gilioli Ranked in Top 10 Influential Energy & Natural Resources Lawyers in Kazakhstan in Business Today
News 09 Apr. 2024
Curtis Announces New Partners and Counsels Across Offices in Spring 2024
Client Alert 28 Dec. 2023
U.S. to Impose Secondary Sanctions on Non-U.S. Banks For Financing Russia’s Defense Industry
Client Alert 21 Apr. 2025
Argentina’s Energy Sector: A New Chapter for Project Finance and Foreign Investment
News 04 Apr. 2025
Curtis Argentina recognized for its work on Viterra Limited's US$34 billion strategic merger
Publications 19 Dec. 2024
Curtis Partner, John Balouziyeh, Authors New Guide to Investing in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the GCC
News 08 Oct. 2024
Curtis Boosts London Finance and Corporate Capability with Appointment of Partner Christopher Harrison
News 24 Aug. 2023
Curtis Attorneys Quoted in CoinDesk on FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s Strategy Ahead of His Criminal Trial
Client Alert 10 Jul. 2024
EU Adopts New Restrictive Measures Against Belarus
Client Alert 26 Jun. 2024
The EU Adopts its 14th Sanctions Package Against Russia
event
Juan Jorge speaks at UM Arbitration Day 2025
client alert
News 25 Jun. 2012
An article by Curtis Restructuring and Insolvency partners Jerrold L. Bregman and Michael A. Cohen and associate Peter J. Buenger, entitled, 'Bankruptcy Sale 'Free and Clear' May Not Shield Against Successor Liability,' was published in the June 25, 2012 special 'Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy” supplement of The New York Law Journal on page S6.
The article analyzes the recent New York District Court decision in Morgan Olson v. Frederico (In re Grumman Olson Indus.), which held that principles of due process override provisions in a bankruptcy court's order approving a bankruptcy sale, issued pursuant to section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, that purported to insulate a purchaser from successor liability for future tort claims, based on the debtor's pre-petition conduct, where the tort claimant had not yet been injured as of the date the sale order was entered.
The Grumman decision, the authors write, provides a 'cautionary tale for buyers' who participate in bankruptcy sales, and 'brings to light an important exception to the general rule that assets sold under the supervision of the bankruptcy court, pursuant to Bankruptcy Code §363, can be cleansed, and sold 'free and clear' of all claims and interests except for those for which the purchaser explicitly bargains.'
Restructuring and Insolvency