News 05 Dec. 2024
Partner Dr. Alexandra G. Maier Recognized Again in Lexology Client Choice Award 2025, Mining Experts Category 2025
more
Event 23 Oct. 2024
Counsel Mohannad El Murtadi Suleiman to Speak at the 2nd Annual Africa Arbitration Day in New York
Event 18 Aug. 2023
Partner Borzu Sabahi Speaks at FDI Moot Shenzhen
News 25 Jul. 2023
Partner Eric Gilioli Ranked in Top 10 Influential Energy & Natural Resources Lawyers in Kazakhstan in Business Today
News 09 Apr. 2024
Curtis Announces New Partners and Counsels Across Offices in Spring 2024
Client Alert 28 Dec. 2023
U.S. to Impose Secondary Sanctions on Non-U.S. Banks For Financing Russia’s Defense Industry
News 04 Apr. 2025
Curtis Argentina recognized for its work on Viterra Limited's US$34 billion strategic merger
News 28 Aug. 2024
Curtis Recognized for Excellence in Arbitration in Chambers Latin America Guide 2025
Publications 19 Dec. 2024
Curtis Partner, John Balouziyeh, Authors New Guide to Investing in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the GCC
News 08 Oct. 2024
Curtis Boosts London Finance and Corporate Capability with Appointment of Partner Christopher Harrison
News 24 Aug. 2023
Curtis Attorneys Quoted in CoinDesk on FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s Strategy Ahead of His Criminal Trial
Client Alert 10 Jul. 2024
EU Adopts New Restrictive Measures Against Belarus
Client Alert 26 Jun. 2024
The EU Adopts its 14th Sanctions Package Against Russia
event
Curtis Attorneys Featured at ASIL 2025 Annual Meeting
news
Curtis Files Pro Bono Amicus Brief for UVA Law School’s Civil Rights Clinic in SCOTUS
News 15 Apr. 2025
On April 14, 2025, acting as pro bono counsel, a Curtis team filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the University of Virginia School of Law’s Civil Rights Clinic and four civil rights organizations in Bowe v. United States.
The question presented is whether a federal statute prohibiting state prisoners from filing second or successive petitions for habeas corpus also applies to federal prisoners seeking to vacate their convictions based on subsequent changes in constitutional law, and whether the relevant statute (AEDPA) has stripped the Supreme Court of jurisdiction to address this question.
A minority of circuits allow federal prisoners to file second or successive motions to vacate their convictions and obtain resentencing based on a literal reading of the relevant provisions of AEDPA, while other circuits prevent federal prisoners from seeking such a correction of their sentences by reading the statute more broadly. The amicus brief highlighted the fundamental injustice that results from the differing interpretations of the statute both for Mr. Bowe and other federal prisoners across circuits.
The Curtis team included Juan Perla, T. Barry Kingham, Robert García, and Joseph Muschitiello.
Juan Perla
Partner
T. Barry Kingham
Robert B. García
Joseph Muschitiello
Associate
New York
+1 212 696 6000
We use cookies on our website to enhance your browsing experience, match your interests and assess our website performance. We do not share information with any third-party for marketing purposes. Please view our privacy policy to learn more about the use of cookies on our website. By continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies.